"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Raul> PDL currently contains R. If you want to get r-pdl out
> Raul> before the freeze, that's excellent. I'll want to pull R
> Raul> from pdl before the freeze if you do that.
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 05:27:56PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> Shouldn't pdl continue to do so? If not, I'll get a seperate r-pdl
> package out otherwise I'm happy to leave them bundled.
Well, let's put it this way...
If I say: perldoc PDL::R the synopsis begins:
use PDL::R;
pnorm(.1,0.0,1.0);
If I execute:
perl -e '
use PDL::R;
pnorm(.1,0.0,1.0);
'
I get a segmentation fault.
Note that this also happens with the PDL that existed before I took
it over.
I'm leaving the current R support in place, as a courtesy, but debugging
this is pretty low on my priority list.
If upstream PDL is going to merge in support for R then I'll be happy
to take a more active hand. But, if this is merely a stopgap, I'm not
very interested in pouring effort into it.
--
Raul
