On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 11:27:32PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 10:56:21PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > > Look at lincity. If I remember right it generates three packages: > > > > > > main, svga and X11. > > > > > > The svga and x11 package contain the binarie for svga and x11 > > > respectivly, while main contains all comon files. The lincity-svga > > > is probaly setuid while the lincity-x11 is not. > > > > That's what I've done from the get-go. > > > > > If root doesn´t want anyone to play lxdoom-svga he won´t install it or > > > copy it somewhere else or change its permissions. The normal setup > > > should allow every user to play it. > > > > Instead of this, though, which could be a problem, I included a script, > > based > > on one in gnuplot, which will configure the suid bit-ness of lsdoom, the > > svgalib > > executable. > > Hmm, I might file a bug against that. Interactive installation realy > sucks and it will bann lsdoom from my demo-fs packages as a possible > game to include. Patching it back to noninteractive is work. :( > > If you have two binaries, make the svga setuid by default. Noone will > install it to not let the users use it. > > In the case of gnuplot, there is only one binary, so you don´t have > the choise at the package level, so it must ask. > > May the Source be with you. > Goswin > > If I'm not mistaken, shouldn't debconf allow this to be as interactive as the maintainer likes?
Frank aka Myth > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
