-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 07:52:36PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote: > > I am trying to package a program, which does not have version number > > ... > > Now what number should have a debian package? > > > > I will probably go for 0beta-1 (debhelper cannot digest just beta-1) > > unless somebody has a better idea.
> Date... 990920-1 or something like that > If you include the date, I'd suggest 0.0.19990920-1 or something like that. The leading 0.0 keeps that version lower than the author's eventual 0.1 or 0.9 or 1.0 or whatever; the 1999 in the date keeps you happy for more than a few months. 0.0.beta-1 is probably just as good. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: noconv Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.1, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBN+Z40K6Bk+4xtwghAQHOyAQAnWKlzeP0s7nqvedJFyDYSp1Vdg66ypyg ELp9vewdKXxwyrGQ6+nVt7Xug7/Wx6NPlXbBIqWnGcb532x+r4JN9wGT521n9vfH 7cG00DCUzUHD+4JHXA0gMUD0qKbYGCsCkLeNVgfHY6qBcx6fUiSfBTR9p+pR+yb9 VVqKvTgRnUw= =Dy19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
