Samuel Tardieu schrieb: > > On 13/04, Olaf Stetzer wrote: > > | my package mountapp is nearly ready, but a few questions are left: > | > | 1.) There are a few little pixmaps included with the sources, > | which are installed to /usr/x11R6/share/mount.app/ > | Now, do I have to make a separate package for them (something sort > | of support-package) or can I leave them in the binary package. > | Personally, I feel that two packages for this little app is > | a little overkill. > > I think you can make one package, especially if icons are needed to have > mount.app work properly. >
Ok, so I will leave it this way. > | 2.) There are two binarys: mount.app and mount.conf. The latter is > | normally invoked by mount.app directly, so do I need to call > | dh_undocumented for this too or can I ignore the lintian-message > | about binary without manpage? (mount.app has no mapage too.) > > You should not have mount.conf in the PATH if it's not intended for users. > Put in under /usr/libexec for example (no need for a manpage), and make > mount.app look for it there. > It is possible to run mount.conf independantly, but normally it is invoked, when double-clicking inside the docking icon. So, leaving it in the PATH is maybe better. But if I do so, what about the manpage then? Olaf ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Olaf Stetzer -- EC/JRC/Institute for Transuranium Elements -- - email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - concerning debian GNU/Linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- "Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny." Frank Zappa -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
