On Sun, Feb 07, 1999 at 02:11:09PM -0500, Mitch Blevins wrote:
> James Troup wrote:
> > Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The $64K question is... is this okay?
> >
> > No; see the fine packaging manual. `build' is a required target for
> > debian/rules (3.2.1) and if you omit, your package will be unbuildable
> > with dpkg-buildpackage and as result will fail for all the non-i386
> > ports and anyone who tries to build the package from source.
>
> Thanks for the pointer. I will put in an empty build target to satisfy
> this.
Mmmh. Somehow I don't like this... can't you do the following:
configure-with-gnome: stamp-conf-w-gnome
stamp-conf-w-gnome:
-mkdir build-w-gnome
cd build-w-gnome && ../configure --with-gnome
stamp-conf-w-gnome
configure-without-gnome: stamp-conf-wo-gnome
stamp-conf-wo-gnome:
-mkdir build-w-gnome
cd build-w-gnome && ../configure --without-gnome
stamp-conf-wo-gnome
build: stamp-build
stamp-build: configure-with-gnome configure-without-gnome
cd build-w-gnome && $(MAKE)
cd build-wo-gnome && $(MAKE)
touch stamp-build
install: stamp-install
stamp-install: build
cd build-w-gnome && $(MAKE) install prefix=`pwd`/../debian/tmp-w-gnome
cd build-wo-gnome && $(MAKE) install prefix=`pwd`/../debian/tmp-wo-gnome
The idea is that "build" does the build, "install" the install. If you just
provide an empty build and install target for sake of policy, this is
probably annoying sometimes to some people who try to sepoerate the build
process from the package installing and building process.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org master.debian.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
