On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 12:47:45PM +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote: > On 06-Jan-99 Shaleh wrote: > > will package nicely because it is well written. My question is: how do I > > cope > > w/ the existing identd? I expect that users installing this would prefer it > > over identd. Is simply placing a call to update-inetd enough? > > I didn't investigate further, but here is the postinst of > wu-ftpd. It disables standard in.ftpd and adds his own > line to /etc/inetd.conf. Maybe you can take this example > as a start point and find some documentation about the > right and official way to do this. ;)
It does what update-inetd does. Actually, since inetd.conf belongs to netbase, wu-ftp should call the provided modify script (update-inetd). However, since inetd.conf is not a conffile, I'm not sure this is technically a bug. Can anyone confirm? Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
