Ben Gertzfield wrote: > This is the right thing to do, assuming we can redistribute libfli.
There isn't a license included, but that's an oversight I will quickly remedy by contacting the author (also the author or xplot and of xwatch, another package I'm doing). I'm sure it'll be LGPL. That's what would be best, right? > Make packages for libfli2 and libfli-dev (assuming the soname of > libfli is 2, for example) and you'll be set. Do you have experience > building Debian packages of libraries? There are a few gotchas that > you'll hit if you don't have experience in it already. No experience at all. And I have a lot to learn too. For example, it only builds a libfli.a static library and no dynamic library at all. Is this okay? FYI, sources are ftp://ftp.icce.rug.nl/pub/unix/libfli-0.1.tar.gz Peter
