sgb-doc sounds like a *good* idea t.aa
Julian Gilbey wrote: > Julian: > > aa: > > > My 'crucial questions' would be: > > > - is the amount of documentation (prose) significantly larger > > > than > > > that of code (apparently, otherwise there would not be the > > > book) > > > > Compiled code = 300kb approx > > Source code = 850 kb approx > > Source code - comments/documentation = 240kb approx > > > > The included documentation therefore accounts for the majority of the > > source code. > > Actually, would it make sense to introduce a new package, sgb-src or > sgb-doc (preferred), which would contain the sources? Among other > things, it would mean that changes in the package wouldn't require > users to download the (unchanged) upstream sources again, and those > who have the book wouldn't need to download the sources.
