On 18 Jul 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"Shaleh" == Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Shaleh> Martin Bialasinski wrote: > >> How about a E-docs package? > > Shaleh> I could do this. It just seemed wasteful. The docs only > Shaleh> make sense if E is installed. > > You may be right in most cases, but there are exceptions. I > have been a satisfied user of FVWM2, but I have been hearing the buzz > about new windowmanages. The web sites and screen shots don't really > talk about functionality (like, how customizable are button and > keyboard events -- like I can switch virtual desktops with a key > combination). > > So, I like to browse through the documentation of various new > fangled window managers -- would be nice if I did not have to install > the code itself (over a 28.8 line) until I have made a decision. > > manoj
Another good reason for a seperate doc's package; If you know the wm really well, don't need the doc's or have them on another machine, and want a lean, minimalist system, you can install it without the doc's. This is probably more likely. ABO ------------------------------------------------------------------ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info, including pgp key ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
