HI, On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 00:59 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > > However i see your point. But i'm still in doubt what about the > > debian/rules file - it is also non-executable after applying the patch > > to the original source - do we have to chmod it manually then? > If you invoke patch 'by hand', then you won't get the executable flags. > But in the dpkg-dev package there's a binary to make it easier for you: > dpkg-source -x albumshaper_2.0-1.dsc > This will unpack the original source, apply the diff and set +x on > rules...
Thanks. I think I'll ask less such questions as i'll continue reading docs at developer's corner :O) > Ps: Do you know that upstream also put a .deb on their page but with > a greater version number than yours? Maybe that's done by you as well... Yes, that is my work. I agreed with the upstream author Will Stokes that we would provide the .deb, altought it's an unofficial package. The version number is my fault, consider the 2.0-1 to be actual. Is that ok? We'll put there the official version there as soon as the package will get official. Jano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
