El día 14/03/2005 a 10:46 Steve Kemp escribio ... > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:57:21PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote: > > > > > while on the other archs the package was built correctly. > > > > What's the problem? > > > > > > Does your package build-depend upon xlibs-dev? > > > > Ehm... no! > > > > I still cannot understand why it could be built on the other archs. > > It does seem strange, maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree. > > > Also, how could I find "missing" build-dep like this without wasting buildd > > time? > > The ideal thing to do in this case would be to look at the config.log > which will show you exactly why the ./configure script couldn't find > X. > > If you have access to a host you could perform a manual build there > and try it out. > > If not add a 'cat config.log' into the debian/rules and wait for > it to be rebuilt. >
You can always use debuild and check the logs later. -Rudy -- Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org ,''`. http://www.apesol.org - http://www.debian.org : :' : GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 `. `' `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
