On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 06:51:52AM +0100, SteX wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:21:41AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Hi Gaudenz, > > > > I'm currently checking all packages owned by the Debian QA Group to > > decide whether they should be removed from Debian or not. > > I definitively want to. You can find it in the repositories: > > deb http://www.openlabs.it/~stex/debian ./ > deb-src http://www.openlabs.it/~stex/debian ./ >
There's a few problems with the package: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ lintian -i aeromail_2.41-1_i386.changes W: aeromail source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8 N: N: The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to N: get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore N: this warning, but please consider updating the package to current N: Policy. N: W: aeromail: extended-description-line-too-long N: N: One or more lines in the extended part of the "Description:" field N: have been found to contain more than 80 characters. For the benefit of N: users of 80x25 terminals, it is recommended that the lines do not N: exceed 80 characters. N: N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 3.4.1 for details. N: Also, your binary-indep in debian/rules could do with looking at: 1) You don't need all those dh_* programs running 2) dh_installmanpages: This program is deprecated, switch to dh_installman. Regrads, Neil McGovern -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
