-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe that post-sarge it's possible to use '~' in version numbers?
>
> When 5.0.0 comes out, I don't want the -beta and -pre releases to sort
> higher than it, and I'd rather not resort to extra ugliness in the
> version number. What would you recommend as the correct version
> numbers to use in the changelog for a smooth upgrade? Are there any
> examples?
Thanks for all the ideas and examples, folks. I went with Goswin's
suggstion, which I like the most. Unfortunately, lintian doesn't like
my packages:
[...]
dpkg-deb: building package `gimp-print' in
`../gimp-print_5.0.0~beta3-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `cupsys-driver-gutenprint' in
`../cupsys-driver-gutenprint_5.0.0~beta3-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3-dev' in
`../libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3-dev_5.0.0~beta3-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3' in
`../libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3_5.0.0~beta3-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3-dev' in
`../libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3-dev_5.0.0~beta3-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3' in
`../libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3_5.0.0~beta3-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `escputil' in `../escputil_5.0.0~beta3-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `ijsgutenprint' in
`../ijsgutenprint_5.0.0~beta3-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-genchanges -mRoger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload
dpkg-buildpackage: full upload (original source is included)
Now running lintian...
E: gutenprint source: bad-version-number 5.0.0~beta3-1
E: libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3-dev: bad-version-number 5.0.0~beta3-1
E: libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3-dev: bad-version-in-relation depends:
libgutenprintui-5.0.0-beta3 (= 5.0.0~beta3-1)
E: libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3-dev: bad-version-in-relation suggests:
libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3-doc (= 5.0.0~beta3-1)
E: libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3: bad-version-number 5.0.0~beta3-1
E: libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3: bad-version-in-relation depends:
libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3 (>= 5.0.0~beta3)
E: libgutenprintui2-5.0.0-beta3: bad-version-in-relation recommends:
gutenprint-locales (>= 5.0.0~beta3-1)
E: libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3-doc: bad-version-number 5.0.0~beta3-1
E: libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3-doc: bad-version-in-relation suggests:
libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3-dev (= 5.0.0~beta3-1)
E: escputil: bad-version-number 5.0.0~beta3-1
E: escputil: bad-version-in-relation depends: libgutenprint-5.0.0-beta3 (>=
5.0.0~beta3)
E: escputil: bad-version-in-relation suggests: gutenprint-locales (>=
5.0.0~beta3-1)
[...]
This is my version number:
$ head -n 1 debian/changelog
gutenprint (5.0.0~beta3-1) unstable; urgency=low
The release was called gutenprint-5.0.0-beta3.tar.gz and unpacks into the
same. I unpacked it, renamed to gutenprint-5.0.0~beta3 and repacked
as gutenprint_5.0.0~beta3.orig.tar.gz.
Is any of this wrong, or is lintian in error?
Are there any real examples of '~' in use yet?
Many thanks,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFCC7zJVcFcaSW/uEgRAgz3AJ9DAqP8hxUvYjBCKMj14qiJOXVoNwCfe0su
tfJMeGRzzzwZrMXX5nbUPQc=
=jRDz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
