On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 14:27 +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:53:06AM -0500, Ryan Stutsman wrote: > > Any takers? It's a very simple package. > > Didn't you think about splitting it to two packages? > Consider that Debian supports 11 archs right now.
I have considered it; however, the reason for the size is because of a couple of BMP files I'm hoping to have them convert to PNG files upstream which should cut down significantly. After looking at it more I found not all of the images in the source directory are used in the code so I removed them from the make install which knocks the file down to under 200 KB. Once I am sure of what the intentions are for the next release upstream I will decide whether to split the package or not. It's possible I could get the package to be even smaller working with the authors a bit. > Your package is 800k big. > > 11 * 800k = 8,8M > > Using one binary dependent package + one independent that would be: > > 11 * 30k + 770k = ~ 1MB > > I know it's not very much, but Debian's archives are very big and overloaded, > and we should search for savings everywhere ;) > > Also remove your README.Debian file, cause it is not saying anything > interested and related to Debian. This is done. > > regards > fEnIo Thanks for taking the time to look at it and for the suggestions. Please take another look if time allows! Ryan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
