On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > The recent thread on names of library packages on debian-devel made me > decide that I made a mistake in naming one of my packages. > Specifically, the vips7.10 source package creates four binary > packages: libvips7.10, libvips7.10-dev, libvips7.10-tools, and > libvips7.10-doc. There's no reason for the version number to be in > the name of the package since there's no reason to support more than > one version of this library at a time.
A more conservative approach would be to rename just libvips7.10-dev, libvips7.10-tools and libvips7.10-doc, and wait for the next ABI change to get rid of libvips7.10. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
