On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 05:32:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 02:48:02AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > > Like with many other things in Debian, how you do it doesn't matter as > > long as you don't break things. Things that should be considered > > include: > > > - Use a -1 Debian revision number for the new upstream release. > > > - Preserve old changelog entries (sounds obvious, but there have been > > incidents...) > > > - Add an entry "New upstream release" to the changelog. > > ... and please note that "New upstream release" is not a change that closes > bugs other than wishlist requests *for* the new upstream release; if there > are changes *in* the new upstream release that fix reported bugs, please > enumerate those changes before closing the bugs in the changelog.
Noted in CVS version of maint-guide. # Describe concisely the changes in the new upstream release that fix reported bugs and close those bugs in the changelog. # Describe concisely the changes to the new upstream release by the maintainer that fix reported bugs and close those bugs in the changelog. OK? Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
