On Friday 07 January 2005 22:03, Mattia Dongili wrote: > Hello, > > this is the second call for sponsors for cpufrequtils, a useful (hint, > sponsor me - sponsor me :)) package with utilities to deal with cpufreq > interface (it contains command line utilities and a shared library).
I really like cpufreq-info -f ;) > Hopefully many of the existing cpufreq related daemons will soon use > the provided library (cpufreqd is migrating at least). Any comment from the cpudyn upstream yet? > > i386 bins and sources available here: > deb http://oioio.altervista.org/debian binary/ > deb-src http://oioio.altervista.org/debian source/ > > The original ITP is 278767. > > Last but not least comments on packaging are welcome. :) o why not libcpufreq0-dev as suggested at http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html At least with libcpufreq1 you will need something like libcpufreq1-dev otherwise one can't build pkg depending on libcpufreq0 interface anymore o AUTHOR, NEWS file isn't included. Btw. AUTHOR file and upstream in debian/copyright do not match. You are too humble ;) o -dev pkg should depend on the libcpufreq0 (= ${Source-Version}) o just wondering: tarball comes precompiled .mo files. Are they cpu architecture independent? o cpufreq.h is GPL 'V2 or later' no only GPL V2. Is just 'Licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL License version 2' in .c files enough? thx for pkging! Achim > Thanks > -- > mattia > :wq! -- To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
