On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 22:07 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 21:25 -0500, Mark Roach wrote:
> > These are native packages i.e. The debian packaging info is part of the > > upstream tarball (I am the author). It is my understanding that since > > there is no difference between upstream and packaged versions no diff is > > necessary... isn't this right? > > Right, I didn't figured out because of the version in the package: When > dealing with native packages, there is no need for adding a Debian > revision, so your versions should look like 0.1, instead of a «common» > 0.1-1 or so. Ahh, this makes sense. I have dropped it. (0.8.1 is in my repository now.) > Building the package on a pbuilder environment brings this error: > > checking for X... no > checking for gconftool-2... no > configure: error: gconftool-2 executable not found in your path - should > be installed with GConf > make: *** [config.status] Error 1 > pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package > > You should just need to build-depend on gconf2. Whoops, I'm not actually using gconf at the moment. I removed it from configure > And just a personal note. If there is not previous release of edsadmin > in the Debian archive why list them on changelog.Debian.gz? That seems sensible. Thanks very much for taking the time to look at this. -Mark
