Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Frank Küster wrote: >> Nick Lewycky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>Is there any plan amongst dpkg type folk to visit and solve this >>>problem? Or even a bug number? >> There are several, of different severities, as you could easily have >> found out yourself. > > I found an 8 year old wishlist bug on dpkg-dev, bug 4588.
There's also #4628, and #203792 with minor severity. > I found a > debian-mentors discussion from 1999 where someone claims that dpkg-dev > should not need to represent binary changes, > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/1999/06/msg00003.html . > > Am I looking in the wrong places? I guess the right place would be [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Are there any serious initiatives, with traction? dpkg has a horribly long list of bugs and feature requests. I doubt that there is serious action to resolve this one in dpkg1, but rumor goes that about dpkg2. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
