Hello all, I'm finishing a package for PStreams (pstreams.sf.net), and the name I gave at first for the package was "pstreams". But maybe the correct name should be "libpstreams".
Well, PStreams is in fact a library, in the sense it's a set of reusable code. But since it's implemented as C++ templated classes, there will not be, AFAICS, a shared library, say, libpstreams.so, only a(some) C++ header file(s). I couldn't find written package naming conventions, so: what do you think? Is a package named lib* supposed to contain a shared library, or it could contain a library in the generic sense, not necessarily implemented as shared objects? We have, for example, the same kind of package already in Debian, named both ways: blitz++ - C++ template class library for scientific computing libfactory++-dev - C++ template factory framework Regards, -- Antonio S. de A. Terceiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~asaterceiro PGP: subkeys.pgp.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
