Hi, based on your hints, I've tried to fix my bugs. Therefore, version 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 was created by me manually (the orig.tar.gz was changed therefore; upstream maintainer has been told), so finally, I've at least reached a small target: As far as I can see it, gnotify 0.8.2-1 is the first that is completely lintian- and linda-clean (and completely I mean, I do not even get warnings any more).
Kind regards, Simon On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:05:38 +0200 GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Simon MARTIN > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > , whereas version 0.8-9 is the first one that is completely > > lintian-clean (the only warnings that remain are those: > I may be wrong on this, but for me 'lintian clean' means without > warnings even. > > > W: gnotify source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status > > W: gnotify source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.log > You can remove them. > > > but I've read this can be ignored when beeing sure that the noted > > files are removed by debian/rules clean, which I'm quite sure > > about). > No. They are _copied there to the source_. So it's can be fixed: move > the 'ifneq' ... 'endif' block to the configure target, and do 'rm -f > config.sub config.guess' in the clean target. > > > To be honest, linda still finds an error: > > > > E: gnotify; Package contains autoconf-generated files. > It's the same like above IMHO. > > > but I've absolutely no idea which files could be blamed for that. > > Please let me know what I've made wrong here. > There are a couple of bad problems with you package. Please fill in > Build-Depends correctly (at least you have to add libgtk2.0-dev and > autotools-dev ; haven't checked for others). Use the configure target > correctly (configure-stamp), and delete the stamp files just before > dh_clean. Also please delete the commented lines (ones that has no > use). > > > [...], it is still quite > > possibly that I'm violating one or more Debian Policies. Please let > > me know in this case. > You do, but you can fix it easily. Please build your package with > pbuilder in a new chroot environment. With this, you can find the > correct build-dependencies and so on. > > > I'd be very thankful for any notes and / or sponsorships. > Hope this helps to find you a sponsor, I can not be it. > > Cheers, > Laszlo/GCS >
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
