Hi Phil, thanks for your review!
On Sat, 08 Mar 2025 09:35:23 +0000 Phil Wyett <philip.wy...@kathenas.org> wrote: > > Test 3 (build twice): Information only > > debian/rules clean > dh clean --sourcedirectory=runit-2.1.2/src \ shouldn't it be --sourcedirectory=runit-2.2.0/src ? > ./runit_2.1.2.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: using patch list from > debian/patches/series dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to > runit- 2.1.2/src/t/timestamp/supervise/status: binary file contents > changed dpkg-source: error: add > runit-2.1.2/src/t/timestamp/supervise/status in anyway, there is a race with the test that creates src/t that makes the build fail on alpha, https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=runit#problem-1 I'll try to fix it in the next upload, maybe is related to your build twice test failure > > autopkgtest: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be > caused by held packages. > runit-init : Conflicts: systemd-sysv but 257.4-1 is to be installed > systemd-sysv : Conflicts: initscripts but 3.14-3 is to be installed > Conflicts: insserv but 1.26.0-1 is to be installed > Recommends: libnss-systemd but it is not installable > autopkgtest [09:17:41]: test init-switch: -----------------------] > autopkgtest [09:17:42]: test init-switch: - - - - - - - - - - > results - - - - > - - - - - - > init-switch FAIL non-zero exit status 100 this one actually passed in the CI for migration https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/runit/testing/amd64/58563396/ I've marked as flaky, I'm not sure what else can be done here Lorenzo
