Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Hi, Jeroen Thank you for taking the time to look at my package
> A new upstream release 0.4.3 came out in December last year and seems to have > been pushed to the upstream branch on salsa, but d/changelog and the master > branch are still at 0.4.2. I updated to the current version, thank you > * copyright: fixed > * copyright: fixed > * copyright: fixed > * rules: fixed > * rules: I opened a ticket and they solved this problem, for now in debian/rules there will be -lXi, in future releases I will remove it. fixed: https://gitlab.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-docklike-plugin/-/commit/5e99f0efd1c56f3beb241da5700a46dd2e46e5f6 > * lintian: fixed (checked and added lintian-overrides) > * control: fixed (libsm-dev is not needed) > Please enable the CI on the salsa repo, it's a great quality control tool and > time saver for all involved. yes, thanks for the advice, I included CI in the project: https://salsa.debian.org/krekhov/xfce4-docklike-plugin/-/pipelines --- Regards, Kirill Rekhov GPG Fingerprint: 2640 769D FDA1 AAA0 F863 D1AE 5F2C 5905 519C E0A0 сб, 22 февр. 2025 г. в 14:03, Jeroen Ploemen <j...@debian.org>: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 21:58:10 +0300 > Kirill Rekhov <krekhov....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfce4-docklike-plugin": > > hi Kirill, > > A new upstream release 0.4.3 came out in December last year and seems > to have been pushed to the upstream branch on salsa, but d/changelog > and the master branch are still at 0.4.2. > > An initial review of the current packaging turned up the following > issues: > * copyright: missing copyright holder and license for header at > src/_gresources.c:1913 > * copyright: sources say "gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0" in numerous > places, included license file is GPL-3, yet d/copyright lists > 'Files: *' as gpl-2+. > * copyright: entry for the debian dir lists copyright holder as > "Debian Xfce Maintainers" but this does not seem to be a team > package? > * rules: why hardcode 'DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=notrimdch' in the override of > dh_installchangelogs? > * rules: the DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND seems to point to an issue in > the upstream build system failing to detect the X Input lib. Is > there an upstream bug report for this somewhere, or a way to fix > the build system to correctly detect that lib? > * lintian hit I: xfce4-docklike-plugin: hardening-no-fortify-functions > [usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/xfce4/panel/plugins/libdocklike.so] may > qualify for an override, as plugins often don't directly import any > libc functions that require hardening (but please do verify that!). > * control: why does this pkg need a build-dep on libsm-dev? > > Please enable the CI on the salsa repo, it's a great quality control > tool and time saver for all involved. > > > Please remove the moreinfo tag (and CC me) once you have an updated > package ready. >