Hi Bo, Thank you very much for your help, for the review and for the upload. I hope i wasn't too much of a burden.
On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 07:20 +0800, Bo YU wrote: > Hi Samo, > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 5:02 AM Samo Pogačnik <samo_pogac...@t-2.net> wrote: > > > > Hi Bo, > > > > On Sun, 2025-02-16 at 20:02 +0100, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > > > On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 01:07 +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 9:19 PM Bo YU <tsu.y...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > Thanks, please change the distribution to unstable and upload it to > > > > > mentor again. I am ccing Phil here.:) > > > > > > > > I noticed you had enabled salsa-ci for git-subrepo[0], that is great. > > > > So I do not think you need to upload to mentor again, just ping me > > > > when you get ready to sponsor. > > > > > > > > But autopkgtest does not work properly. Maybe you could fix this at > > > > next time, because this will cost your some time I think, how do you > > > > think? > > > > > > > > But two lintians you can fix as it is easy: > > > > > > > > ``` > > > > X: git-subrepo source: update-debian-copyright 2024 vs 2025 > > > > [debian/copyright:67] > > > > X: git-subrepo source: upstream-metadata-file-is-missing > > > > ``` > > > > > > > > Just do it, adding new commits is okay, see my tips 2[1] again. > > > > > > > > > > I'll do that, unfortunately i can not find this lintian output in the > > > pipeline > > > nor in my local 'gbp buildpackage' output. How did you find that and what > > > should > > > i watch for regarding autopkgtest (for next time)? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Samo > > > > > > > > [0]: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/git-subrepo/-/pipelines/816774 > > > > [1]https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979188#282 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > Bo > > > > > > > I hope, i am ready to sponsor: > > - done d/copyright and d/upstream/metadata > > - set distro to unstable > > Uploaded. Thanks again. > > Please tell Danial you have uploaded the 0.4.9-2 to unstable and > thanks to his almost review work.;) > In fact, I think the package should be marked as all package because > it is no-arch-dependent-files, please discuss this with Danial also. I > will not prevent this uploading due to this because the maintainer > needs positive feedback in time.:) > Actually i do not know where i stand at the moment, as Daniel said, that he currently does not have time to do reviews on git-subrepo. But we'll see... and i'll check the 'all package' option and enabling the autopkgtest, as soon as my spare time allows for. > For lintian verbose, you can enable the option like this in > .sbuildrc(if you use build): > > ``` > $run_lintian = 1; > $lintian_opts = ['-EvIL', '+pedantic']; > ``` > Do not forget to enable autopkgtest if possible. Please refer to > [1]&[2] if you have free time almost all Debian affairs is recorded in > these documents. Subscribing and reading related Debian development > mail lists is a quick path to improve packaging and maintaining > skills. > Thanks for that as well. > Thanks for your contribution to Debian! > > BR, > Bo > > [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ > Debian Developer's Reference > [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ > Debian Policy Manual > > Until next time with best regards, Samo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
