Hello, * Patrice Duroux <patrice.dur...@gmail.com> [2025-02-07 19:58]: > I'm facing this issue on another package (lix[1]). Any advice to > resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated > with probably my contribution to an addition with a section regarding > the reproducibility to > https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/Peutch-guest/lix/-/jobs/7051515
I downloaded the job artifacts from gitlab, then unpacked the .deb files (from debian/output/reprotest/control/source-root and debian/output/reprotest/experiment-1/source-root), and found that the lix executables was different using diff. I used diffoscope to compare the binaries, here is the result: https://try.diffoscope.org/tqdbhpedszxk.html - GNU 0x00000014 NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID bitstring) Build ID: d49d6ec5ed2e8106d03b5a576869a5f29d12f36d + GNU 0x00000014 NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID bitstring) Build ID: 54f79a02c77277ec809e80197ee2e5e44d8fa60e I am not familiar with the D programming language, I guess there is a build option you can add to disable this build id generation. Nicolas.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature