Hello,

* Patrice Duroux <patrice.dur...@gmail.com> [2025-02-07 19:58]:
> I'm facing this issue on another package (lix[1]). Any advice to
> resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated
> with probably my contribution to an addition with a section regarding
> the reproducibility to
>  https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages
> 
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/Peutch-guest/lix/-/jobs/7051515

I downloaded the job artifacts from gitlab, then unpacked the .deb files
(from debian/output/reprotest/control/source-root and
debian/output/reprotest/experiment-1/source-root), and found that the
lix executables was different using diff.

I used diffoscope to compare the binaries, here is the result:

https://try.diffoscope.org/tqdbhpedszxk.html

-  GNU                  0x00000014      NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID 
bitstring)         Build ID: d49d6ec5ed2e8106d03b5a576869a5f29d12f36d
+  GNU                  0x00000014      NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID 
bitstring)         Build ID: 54f79a02c77277ec809e80197ee2e5e44d8fa60e

I am not familiar with the D programming language, I guess there is a
build option you can add to disable this build id generation.

Nicolas.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to