Adam, Debian/copyright must specify a license for each entry. The one for debian/* is missing.
W: bashbro source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright License [debian/copyright: 10] N: N: The paragraph in the machine readable copyright file is missing a field N: that is required by the specification. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ for N: details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/copyright/dep5 You can see an example at: https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/copyright? ref_type=heads You should add the following two lines to debian/control, which specify the location of the packaging repository. Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/adanisch/bashbro.git Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/adanisch/bashbro You can see an example at: https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/control? ref_type=heads As the upstream README.md has important information for end users, you might want to install it into /usr/share/doc/bashbro. You can do this by creating a file named debian/docs and populating it with the single line: README.md Beyond the files dh_installdocs automatically installs, it will look for those listed in debian/docs and install them into /usr/share/doc/bashbro. This isn’t a problem for the packaging, but the upstream lists version 1.05 in the header. It is fine to upload the Debian package that way, but you probably want to either update the version number in the header with each release or remove it. On Saturday, September 7, 2024 6:24:14 PM MST Adam Danischewski wrote: > Hi Soren, > > If you could build it from the current repo that would be great! > > If there are any problems please let me know - I'll address them as soon as > possible. > > Thanks, > +Ad -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
