On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 11:39 +0100, Peter B wrote: > On 19/08/2024 08:13, Phil Wyett wrote: > > Looks like it wants to flag one by one on different files. Best to have a > > review of all the *.po files and run checking. > > Hi Phil, > > That's the whole point of the --terse option. > > Using the -t option with lrc is a good idea for your reviews, > to give a concise indication of problems. > > However, maintainers fixing a copyright file should run > lrc without it, otherwise issues will be hidden. > > > Maybe be remove the '-t' from your standard appendix [4], > even if you prefer to use it yourself for the reviews? > > > Regards, > Peter > > P.S. > > For full info, run lrc -h >
Peter, Yes, got used to '-t' and documented wrongly etc. Amended my appendix accordingly. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
