* Shriram Ravindranathan <s...@ters.dev> [240828 05:30]: > On 27/08/24 22:45, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > | Section: python > > > > Why? That keep is implemented in python is an implementation detail. > > Why not "shells" or "education" or even "utils" instead? > That makes sense, I will change it to an appropriate section.
> > | Source: python-keep > > I felt 'keep' was a bit too generic a name for the package. It is. But adding "python" in front doesn't help. Your package will also still take the "keep" program name, so renaming the package doesn't help. > moreover, several other python packages in Debian seemed to be doing the > same (for instance https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-raccoon > from https://github.com/rsheftel/raccoon) python-raccoon is a library. Your package is a program meant to be directly used. Taking conclusions from libraries and applying to programs is usually a bad idea. > Would it be better if I kept the original name? Probably. Would be good if upstream would pick a less generic name, but changing that downstream usually just confuses everyone. Chris
