On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 18:39 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 10:26 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > On Monday, July 22, 2024 8:08:08 AM MST Phil Wyett wrote: > > > Your absolutely right. The use of these tags would be better and I shall > > > do > > > so. When Salvo wishes to browse ready packages, all that needs to be done > > > is > > > follow the below link: > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi? > > include=tags%3Aconfirmed;package > > > =sponsorship-requests > > > > Why not use mark it as ready using both the tags and the email subject? > > That > > way, people using either interface can easily see RFPs that are ready. > > > > Hi Soren, > > Both can be done if people are happy with and want that. > > Regards > > Phil >
Hi all, The data now being added, be it on a subject line or via bts control all require that a submission to mentors file an RFS. We have many that state they do not require a sponsor or not file an RFS. This makes processing difficult and time intensive. Should we require all submissions to mentors file an RFS? Please discuss. :-) Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
