On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such > > situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive? > Since you are the only one using I would say link it in > static. Problem solved. I made it this way. Seems to work fine. > But on second thought, seeing that its utilitie_s_, static linking > would waste ram. I was wrong. I thought it will provide many small binaries, but seems that it is linked in one binary with many features. So there won't be wasting ram. > But you are still the only one using that library and could combine > the two sources into one package. If the soname changes all the time > both need to be uploaded and recompiled in sync anyway. No point in > making two debs. Making one deb from these two upstream sources wasn't as simple as I thought... nevermind. I've just made package with library. This should first come to Debian's archive, and then I'll provide packages that depends on it.
I have made this package. Now only checking it with pbuilder
to ensure it builds fine with it.
When this will be done, then I ask for sponsor here...
I hope that someone upload it for me ;)
Thanks once again for answers.
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Feński | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Głowackiego 3/15 - w. małopolskie - Polska
(0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - najsłabsze ogniwo
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
