On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 02:27:00AM -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote: > > As another example, I did see an X11 image viewer that was just named > feh after it's executable so that might not be a big issue. >
If you do call it tiv, make sure that the name is readily understood in package description. > And second, this might be a question for a different list, but I'm not > sure how to best enter in the license information. According to their > LICENSE file, it can be redistributed under either the GPL 3.0 license > or the Apache 2.0 Software License, both approved for Debian. I was > considering just listing it as one of them, but I don't know if that's > proper. > If it can be redistributed under both, include both. Some commercial users might want to only use Apache - for example - but would need to know the full licensing. All the very best, Andy > -- > Loren M. Lang > lor...@north-winds.org > http://www.north-winds.org/ > > > Public Key: ftp://ftp.north-winds.org/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc > Fingerprint: 10A0 7AE2 DAF5 4780 888A 3FA4 DCEE BB39 7654 DE5B >
