On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:39:08AM +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > * Package name : lsb-release-minimal > Version : 12.0-1
> lsb-release-minimal (12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * New upstream release > * d/control: Rename binary package to `lsb-release` > * d/tests/alternative-bin-sh: Test with busybox sh Looks good, but I don't think leaving users of unstable/testing who have helped us test, with an unsupported package, would be nice. Thus, could you please add a dummy transitional binary "lsb-release-minimal" that depends on lsb-release? Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ The ill-thought conversion to time64_t will make us suffer from ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ the Y292B problem. So let's move the Epoch by 435451400064000000 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ (plus a safety margin in case of bad physicists) and make it ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ unsigned -- that'll almost double the range.
