On Thu, 2022-06-30 at 17:10 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Am 30.06.22 um 17:00 schrieb Matt Barry: > > I'm willing to > > wade through it, but is the position of the project immovably that > > eg. > > ogg files are not redistributable without "source"? (Are there > > examples of packages that actually do this?) > > Please see an example with Photoshop files for pngs at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010399#25 > If source files exist they have to be provided. If the ogg files are > the primary form of modification it is okay in my > opinion. You have to do a little research for that. I have not even > checked if the files are still existing with the new > version.
Thanks for the reference; I will do some reading. > > The git repo that you have used to build the new version was actually > not used by the former maintainer who got the > pkg into Debian. The version in the archive is completely different. > The git repo should be rebuilt using gbp > import-dscs --debsnap. I can do that for you if you do not know how > to. The archive also holds a seemingly complete > copyright file, which your version lacks. That makes sense; let me see if I can figure it out. > > Also, please separate your debian/ changes from the upstream changes. > That is what master and upstream branches are for. To clarify, I think that I rebased the upstream merge and debian/ changes into a single commit, which should be separate? (That makes sense to me, just making sure.) Thanks! Matt
