-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 04 March 2004 15:20, Jarno Elonen wrote: > The commercial customers may also use Qt without fee - provided that > they release their software under the GPL (which they usually do not). > > It would be a different matter if Qt's license prohibited *some* > explicitly named software vendors from using it without paying some > license fees. > > The problem with ckermit is probably that the said Unix vendors don't > have to link anything against it (unlike users of Qt, which is a > library) and would therefore have no real reason to buy a proprietary > GPL-escape license.
Got it ... thanks for clearing that up. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAR0oFy4qcZK7v0ScRAuDQAKDI26YSBc0QUFGbfdeLtJu2iAaV5ACggMiN mZlAaqi9oj/NnHyrFYbQbXs= =Pj8B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
