On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:33:39AM +0100, Philipp Gortan wrote: > Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> >The proper place for the script (after doing things right) is > >ghostscript upstream. Take a look at pdf2ps and try to get your program > >next to that. There's no reason to produce packages for a one liner. > Hi mentors, > ok, so we know the opinion of Thomas, what does the rest of you think? > Should it go into gs-common and the like? > Or is it package-able on its own? > Thanks for your input, > regards I quite agree that this doesn't merit its own package. Submitting it for inclusion with gs upstream seems like a good idea. Otherwise, I think the vast majority of users who can't figure out the ghostscript commandline on their own (including myself) will cope with the inefficiencies of pdftk just fine. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
