On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 08:27:38AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:26:22PM +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote: > > Well this RFS is 4 months old, so yes it's a little late for it to reach > > bullseye :) > > (As this RFS was filed after the soft freeze deadline, it would not have > reached bullseye. [1]) > > > We're about to relase 3.60 soon anyway, so depending on bullseye's release > > date > > > Question: in case 3.55 and 3.56 never make it in Debian, should I remove the > > entries from d/changelog ? > > I've seen both: removal and keeping… So you decide for yourself; if you keep > the unreleased, mark them as UNRELEASED though. (my personal bikeshed color is > to remove the unreleased ones and have the entries in the eventually uploaded > version only;)
You can also mark them as experimental instead. Of course, this requires an actual upload, but that suite is open for uploads. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ The oldest dated printed book includes the following license grant: ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Reverently made for universal free distribution by Wang Jie ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ on behalf of his two parents on the 15th of the 4th moon of ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ the 9th year of Xiantong [11 May 868].
