Hello Anton, thanks for your time testing my upload!
Apparently, piuparts tries to install the package 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1 instead of 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2, why? In the old package 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1, the control file contains libmumps-seq-5.3.1 as libfreefem++ dependency which does not exist anymore in sid. The control file of the build package (3.61.1+dfsg1- 5.2) indicates libmumps-seq-5.3, which exists in sid. The problem is not new [1] and it appears since the version 5.3.4 of mumps. In the mumps changelog [2], we can read: > MUMPS is now ABI-compatible in the minor version. > Provide new packages as libmumps-5.3, etc instead of libmumps-5.3.4 I think that rebuilding the package and using puipart with the 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 should be fine. Let me know if I'm missing something. Best, François [1] https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/f/freefem++.html [2] https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/m/mumps/changelog-5.3.5-2 Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 22:31 +0200, Anton Gladky a écrit : > Your upload is fine. It fixes the FTBFS. But piuparts > identified some problems with the installation of libfreefem++-dev > [1]. > > Could you please verify whether the problem really exists or not? > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/freefempp/-/jobs/1640984 > > Thanks > > Anton > > > Am Do., 13. Mai 2021 um 19:27 Uhr schrieb François Mazen < > franc...@mzf.fr>: > > Dear Science Team, > > > > In case of a DD in this list is interested: I'm forwarding my > > Request > > For Sponsor about RC bug that I've just fixed in the freefem++ > > package. > > It should prevent the removal of the package in the next release. > > > > Then, I volunteer to maintain this package as it need to be updated > > with the new upstream version. > > > > Best Regards, > > François > >
