On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 11:13:53 +0200 Juhani Numminen <juhaninummin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please also close these two bugs in your changelog: > > #975985, ITA is to be closed when you set yourself as the new > maintainer/uploader [1] > > #747424, requesting the new upstream version done. > The changelog should mention that Bdale removed himself from the list > of Uploaders. [2] done. > The mentors.d.n page shows that the packages still depend on python2, > so are you first making the package name change python->python2 > (#966736) and only later switching to python3 (#936593)? yes. I know, migration to python3 is inevitable. However, the transition from geda-gaf-1.8 to 1.10 involved large amounts of python code. I talked to upstream (Roland Lutz): Migration to python3 will be a little tedious and non-trivial. It will be the main focus of upcoming development, non the less. > If that's the > case, we need to unmerge #966736 and #936593. > > [1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3 > [2] > https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team/geda-gaf/-/commit/8633b12b984541ab5ca1c139ffed7d10b3871439 Beeing new to Debian package maintenance, I am unsure how to proceed on this. Should I act on the bugs? Am I allowed to set tags? If so which would be appropriate? ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0x7B0F9882
pgpSMjPT7mL8p.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature