> > I dont want to work with Octave since it is interpreter based and the > > whole point behind numerical analysis is super speed. > > > > Old fashion programmer uh? :) Anyway, any C library can be potentially > embedded in a scripting language like octave (as it's true for perl or > python). So the integration with octave or scilab or anything else can > be attained later.
are you nuts, or just crazy? odds are that the stuff in octave and friends (atlas, lapack, etc) is a LOT better tested than what you're writing from scratch... most of those have been tested for YEARS, not just weeks or months. i hate to put it this way, but it sounds like you're spewing blue-sky notions. and this is probably getting a little off-topic for d-mentors. elijah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
