Magnus Therning wrote: > Well, from my reading of the license, and my inspection of the source > code, all but some articles are Public Domain. I am making sure this is > correct. If this is so (all python source in PD), then it would be > acceptable for Debian? You probably should discuss this with debian-legal, including whether the PD notice is acceptable as is. AFAICT people seem to be happier if a thing says license even if the license itself is very liberal (with common license wordings (MIT,GPL,etc.) preferred. For the non-pd stuff: I'd think *everything* in the package has to be free. (See recent threads about non-free in debian-devel for comparison with packages that are deemed to be not free.
Cheers T. -- Thomas Viehmann, <http://beamnet.de/tv/>
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
