On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 06:33:10PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote: > > On 5/31/20 9:19 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > > If you want to follow this route, your next step would be now to contact > > the fox1.6 maintainer by filing a wishlist bug against src:fox1.6, asking > > to package the version you need, explaining the situation and maybe (== > > if you want) tell them that you would commit helping to offset the extra > > work caused by maintaining the development snapshot. > > > > * dak spits out those r-deps: > > ace: libfox-1.6-dev > > gogglesmm: libfox-1.6-dev > > libgwenhywfar: libfox-1.6-dev > > pcsc-cyberjack: libfox-1.6-dev > > sumo: libfox-1.6-dev > > xfe: libfox-1.6-dev (>= 1.6.45) > > > I tried doing this with reportbug but I failed. It asks me first for the > package where the bug is found. I entered as you suggested "src:fox1.6". > Reportbug complains "src:fox1.6 is not a valid package name.". What am I > doing wrong?
Ah, sorry, didn't meant to confuse you. src:$package just means "against the source package", so you would do a "reportbug --src fox1.6" or a plain "reportbug fox1.6" works too. > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüssen > Plüss Roland > > Game Development and Game Engine Technologies https://dragondreams.ch >
