Hi Adam, On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 5:04 AM Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:49:10AM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. > > > > binary:coinor-libdylp1 is NEW. > > Hrm, my script for automating bindebdiffs doesn't handle > appearing/disappearing binaries well, making them easy to miss. And I > didn't notice that bit. > > Thus: it's fit for re-upload, but generally, it's best for a package for > NEW, even binNEW, to be in a good shape (rather than small incremental > changes which I prefer), thus I wonder if you'd like to polish at least the > changelog first. > > In which, mentioning other removed/added binaries is another important bit.
Thanks for taking a look at it. I was actually confused with the names. The previous package coinor-libdylp0 provides "/usr/lib/libDylp.so.0" linking to "/usr/lib/libDylp.so.0.0.0" and I think that is the reason the package was named with a '0'. But the version was wrong. It should have been named "/usr/lib/libDylp.so.1.6.0" and the package name should have had a '1' instead of '0'. But anyway, do you think I should keep the name as "coinor-libdylp0" instead of moving to "coinor-libdylp1" based on my above mentioned understanding? While polishing it, I think I will also push it to salsa, that will also fix two other lintian warnings. -- Regards Sudip
