> On Oct 31, 2019, at 00:36, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 2019-10-30 22:27 -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote: > >> I should remove debian/rumur.manpages, right? > > I don't think that is a particularly good idea. At least you want to > keep ast-dump/doc/rumur-ast-dump.1 in debian/rumur.manpages, because > this file is apparently not installed otherwise.
I’m sorry, I don’t follow. rumur-ast-dump.1 *is* installed by the upstream CMake-driven build process. In fact, I deleted debian/rumur.manpages just now and it bypasses the dh_installman error and results in a lintian-clean build of the package. > Attached is a suitable (IMHO) workaround that you can apply until > #943705 is fixed. > >> Why do you describe this as a regression? > > It is a regression in dh_installman, because this worked before the > man-recode introduction. Ah I see what you mean. Thanks for the explanation.
