Hi Tobias, > This changelog entry does not really make sense / completly unclear. > Please be more concise. For the breaks+replace: > the changelog entry should answer the question "Why" not "what", it is > completly unclear what you want to archieve.
I forgot to complement when I was testing and correcting the package. The reason for adding Breaks+Replaces is that in the previous package it was: Breaks: assaultcube-data (<< 1.1.0.4+repack1) Replaces: assaultcube-data (<< 1.1.0.4+repack1) As the latest version of the package was "1.1.0.4+repack1-2.1",the assaultcube-data "1.2.0.2.1-2" package was not found in my tests. > the mentioned bug is the ITA, you should have closed that with the > previous upload. It is wrong to close it now, you need to close it with > interacting with the BTS. I understand, this is my first package I want to adopt. I hope to adopt more packages in the future, fix them and update them. Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
