Hello,

I am trying to build an updated packaging.

But it is falling:

[29/150] c++ -Isrc/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha -Isrc/libcamera
-I../src/libcamera -Iinclude -I../include -I../src/libcamera/include
-fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Werror -std=c++11
-Wno-unused-parameter -include config.h -g -O2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/home/pkg/libcamera/libcamera=. -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC
-pthread  -MD -MQ 'src/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha/process.cpp.o' -MF
'src/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha/process.cpp.o.d' -o
'src/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha/process.cpp.o' -c
../src/libcamera/process.cpp
FAILED: src/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha/process.cpp.o
c++ -Isrc/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha -Isrc/libcamera -I../src/libcamera
-Iinclude -I../include -I../src/libcamera/include
-fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Werror -std=c++11
-Wno-unused-parameter -include config.h -g -O2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/home/pkg/libcamera/libcamera=. -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC
-pthread  -MD -MQ 'src/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha/process.cpp.o' -MF
'src/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha/process.cpp.o.d' -o
'src/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha/process.cpp.o' -c
../src/libcamera/process.cpp
../src/libcamera/process.cpp: In function ‘void
libcamera::{anonymous}::sigact(int, siginfo_t*, void*)’:
../src/libcamera/process.cpp:74:13: error: ignoring return value of
‘ssize_t write(int, const void*, size_t)’, declared with attribute
warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
  (void)write(ProcessManager::instance()->writePipe(), &data, sizeof(data));
        ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors

Any idea?
Regards


El mar., 25 de jun. de 2019 a la(s) 15:51, Andrej Shadura (
andrew.shad...@collabora.co.uk) escribió:

> On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:38:39 -0300 "eamanu15 ."
> <emmanuelaria...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > hi.
> > > i haven't looked into your packaging yet, but...
> > >
> > > - i'm interested in sponsoring the package
> > >
> > Great!
>
> I am too interested in sponsoring :)
>
> > - would you consider maintaining the package under the multimedia-team
> > > umbrella?
> > >
> >
> > It would be great. I think I will need to ask for permission to
> > multimedia-team. I will send a mail :-)
>
> I have added you to the salsa project. I have create a repo and will
> push a cleaned up version of your work for you to have a look at.
>
> > > - last time i checked libcamera it wasn't really usable. do you know
> > > anything about the timeframe for a first upstream release? (i haven't
> > > really followed any discussion)
>
> > I think is usable for test. Maybe we will be start with a experimental
> > release for Debian? (Not unstable).
> >
> > I open the discussion for a release, but the developers don't feel that
> > libcamera is ready for a first release yet.  I will contact them for new
> > news.
>
> Probably uploading to experimental first is a good idea.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>   Andrej
>
>

-- 
Arias Emmanuel
http://eamanu.com
Github/Gitlab; @eamanu
Debian: @eamanu-guest

Reply via email to