On 25/06/2019 23:58, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:46:41PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: >> One of the criteria for software to enter Debian is it being generally >> useful and balance the added functionality with the inevitable resources >> that will be required to keep a package in the archive. In this case, >> unless I am missing something, your utility does not offer any function >> that cannot be readily obtained combining standard utilities already in >> Debian. This is also a balance in discoverability: anyone familiar with >> an Unix command line would find the above solution more quickly reading >> the relevant man pages, than searching the archive for a package doing >> the same. Additionally, because of the flat hierarchy of the binaries >> in $PATH, I think that any command line utility with a two characters >> name is very likely to incur in a name collision. > > That is mostly true but it mismatches > Subject: Intro and Seeking Sponsor
How is what I wrote not relevant for a request for sponsor? Cheers, Dan
