On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 05:32:40PM +0200, Albert van der Horst wrote: > (An earlier non-personal call for reviews yielded no reactions.) > I eagerly await your review of > https://mentors.debian.net/package/lina > especially whether it complies with the "preferred form of modification" > guidelines.
The current version of the package fails to build: makeinfo lina.texinfo --no-split -o lina.info make[1]: makeinfo: Command not found make[1]: *** [Makefile:52: lina.info] Error 127 which is trivially fixable by adding texinfo to Build-Depends. Besides that, in a cursory review, I don't see any other issues. I can't claim I understand your build system, though. And unlike not understanding merely the packaged program's functionality, I don't think I can sign this myself. Thus, it'd be nice if someone else took a look as well. I don't quite see what's the new relation between ciforth and lina, too. Meow! -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.
