Your message dated Mon, 4 Jun 2018 19:42:40 +0200
with message-id <20180604174240.3xazbxcljgor5...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#887870: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #887870,
regarding RFS: pcc/1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
887870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887870
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pcc"
* Package name : pcc
Version : 1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1
Upstream Author : Anders Magnusson <ra...@ludd.ltu.se>
* URL : http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/
* License : BSD
Section : devel
It builds those binary packages:
pcc - Portable C Compiler
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/pcc
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pcc/pcc_1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
[your most recent changelog entry]
Regards,
Yangfl
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:57:46PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> 2018-06-03 8:02 GMT+08:00 Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl>:
> > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 03:01:55PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> >> * Package name : pcc
> >> Version : 1.2.0~DEVEL+20180120-1
> > I just got around to review this (with a _slight_ delay...), so after
> > previous rounds, this package looks fine for NEW.
> >
> > However, it would be nearly completely useless without -libs, which would
> > also hinder review ftp guys can do. Thus, what about having at least an
> > initial upload of both at the same time?
>
> OK, I opened another ITP for pcc-libs and re-uploaded pcc* to
> mentors.d.o. Much thanks for your advice.
Both are in NEW. Let's see how it goes...
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ I've read an article about how lively happy music boosts
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ productivity. You can read it, too, you just need the
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ right music while doing so. I recommend Skepticism
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ (funeral doom metal).
--- End Message ---
