On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:10:41AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2018-05-25 at 09:47, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:48:23PM -0300, eamanu15 wrote: > >> Package: sponsorship-requests > >> Severity: normal > > > > This should be mailed to submit@bugs.d.o, not the mailing list. It > > did not get a tracking bug this way, thus those who use the BTS as > > their primary view wouldn't notice it. > > Actually, the original mail as I received it *did* have s@b.d.o in the > To: list; it just also had the mailing list's address present explicitly. > > How the software which normally results in a RFS bug getting passed on > to this mailing list handles that situation I'm not sure.
Indeed: } To: "sub...@bugs.debian.org" <sub...@bugs.debian.org>, } "895...@bugs.debian.org" <895...@bugs.debian.org>, Arnaud Fontaine } <ar...@debian.org>, "python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org" } <python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Debian Mentors List } <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org> And a bug _was_ created (#900041), just somehow not forwarded to this list. Probably because the list was already in the "To:" field. Closing it then, thanks for noticing. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .globl _start↵.data↵rc: .ascii "/etc/init.d/rcS\0"↵.text↵_start ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ mov $57,%rax↵syscall↵cmp $0,%rax↵jne child↵parent:↵mov $61,%rax ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ mov $-1,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall↵jmp parent↵child: ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ mov $59,%rax↵mov $rc,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall
