On Sat, 2018-05-19 at 10:55 +0000, Lumin wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:49:05PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > I wonder if the simplest solution is to just have > > intel-mkl Depends: libblas. i.e. use policy to simply prevent a > > sole > > mkl installation. > > > > That way, the mkl alternative will always have a free BLAS to press > > it's preference against. > > That's exactly a part of the present implementation. > > It depends on libblas3 | libblas.so.3, and enhances libblas.so.3, but > never provides libblas.so.3 . Similar for lapack.
It's come together well then. Thanks for your efforts on it, Lumin.
